Compare

Muse Code vs. the field.

Price and capability against Claude Opus 5, OpenAI Codex, DeepSeek V4, GLM-5.2, and MiniMax M3 — from vendor price sheets and published benchmarks, as of August 7, 2026.

API pricing, per 1M tokens

Cached input is what agentic coding mostly pays for — repository context re-sent every turn.

MODEL
INPUT
CACHED IN
OUTPUT
DATA POLICY
muse-spark-1.2-contributorMETA
$0.10
$0.002
$0.20
May be used to improve Meta products
muse-spark-1.2 (standard)META
$1.25
$0.15
$4.25
Never used for training; zero-retention via sales
Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic)
$5.00
$0.50
$25.00
Not trained on API data by default
GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI)
$5.00
$0.50
$30.00
Not trained on API data by default
GPT-5.6 Terra (OpenAI · Codex default)
$2.00
$0.20
$12.00
Not trained on API data by default
Grok 4.5 (xAI)
$2.00
$0.50
$6.00
Not trained on API data by default
Gemini 3.6 Flash (Google)
$1.50
$0.15
$7.50
Paid tier not used for training
DeepSeek V4 Flash
$0.14
$0.0028
$0.28
Open weights; hosted-API terms apply
DeepSeek V4 Pro
$0.435
$0.0036
$0.87
Open weights; hosted-API terms apply
GLM-5.2 (Z.AI)
$1.40
$4.40
Open weights; hosted-API terms apply
MiniMax M3
$0.60
$2.40
Open weights; hosted-API terms apply

Coding-agent capability

Agent benchmarks measure the model inside its harness. Scores from Meta’s published evaluation and vendor-reported results; missing cells mean no published score.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 bar chart: Claude Opus 5 86.7%, Muse Spark 1.2 82.9%, GPT 5.6 Terra 81.8%, Grok 4.5 81.6%, Gemini 3.6 Flash 78.9%, Muse Spark 1.1 76.2%

Terminal-Bench 2.1, the full field

Meta’s published chart adds context the table can’t: Muse Spark 1.2 in Muse Code (82.9%) sits second behind Claude Opus 5 max in Claude Code (86.7%), ahead of GPT 5.6 Terra max in Codex (81.8%), Grok 4.5 high in Grok Build (81.6%), and Gemini 3.6 Flash high in Antigravity CLI (78.9%) — and a full 6.7 points above its own predecessor, Muse Spark 1.1 in mini-swe-agent (76.2%).

AGENT / MODEL
TERMINAL-BENCH 2.1
DEEPSWE 1.1
CONTEXT
OPEN WEIGHTS
Muse Code + Muse Spark 1.2Meta · co-trained model + harness
82.9%
59.3%
1M
No (API + agent)
Claude Code + Opus 5Anthropic · first-party agent
86.7%
65.0%
1M
No (API + agent)
Codex + GPT-5.6 Terra (max)OpenAI · first-party agent
81.8%
64.8%
1M
No (API + agent)
Grok Build + Grok 4.5 (high)xAI · first-party agent
81.6%
500K
No (API + agent)
Antigravity CLI + Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)Google · first-party agent
78.9%
1M
No (API + agent)
DeepSeek V4 Flash / Provia OpenCode / third-party harnesses
1M
Yes (MIT)
GLM-5.2Z.AI · via third-party harnesses
Yes
MiniMax M3via third-party harnesses · 80%+ SWE-bench Verified
Yes

On price, two different fights

Muse standard ($1.25/$4.25) undercuts Claude Opus 5 ($5/$25) by 4–6x while sitting above the Chinese open-weight trio. The Contributor tier ($0.10/$0.20) drops below even DeepSeek V4 Flash ($0.14) on input — the price of sharing your data.

On capability, second place — closely

On Terminal-Bench 2.1, Muse Spark 1.2 + Muse Code (82.9%) trails Claude Opus 5 (86.7%) and edges Codex running GPT-5.6 Terra (81.8%), with Grok Build (81.6%) and Antigravity CLI (78.9%) behind. On DeepSWE 1.1 the gap is wider (59.3% vs. 65.0%). Frontier-adjacent, at a fraction of frontier price.

The cache column decides real bills

Agent sessions re-send repository context every turn. Muse Contributor’s $0.002 cached input is the lowest figure on the table; DeepSeek V4 Flash’s $0.0028 is the only close rival. For long sessions, this row matters more than headline input price.

Sources: Meta Model API pricing and evaluation report (research.meta.ai); OpenAI (GPT-5.6 rates after the July 30, 2026 cut), Anthropic, xAI (Grok 4.5, July 8, 2026), Google (Gemini 3.6 Flash, July 21, 2026), DeepSeek (V4 Flash public beta, July 31, 2026), Z.AI, and MiniMax published price sheets; third-party pricing trackers, checked August 7, 2026. Benchmark conditions differ across vendors — treat scores as directional. Prices change; verify on each vendor’s page before budgeting.